First Round · 2016-17
7 games · Utah Jazz advanced
Every game
Game 1Apr 15
UTAH 97@
LAC 9522·30·22·23 / 24·28·18·2531%Game 2Apr 18
UTAH 91@
LAC 9918·24·28·21 / 29·22·28·2067%Game 3Apr 21
LAC 111@
UTAH 10621·28·33·29 / 34·24·26·2239%Game 4Apr 23
LAC 98@
UTAH 10526·26·28·18 / 24·31·22·2858%Game 5Apr 25
UTAH 96@
LAC 9219·27·18·32 / 21·22·15·3431%Game 6Apr 28
LAC 98@
UTAH 9320·27·31·20 / 22·23·25·2338%Game 7Apr 30
UTAH 104@
LAC 9124·22·33·25 / 24·15·24·2832%
Each game opens its own page with the period breakdown, the team totals and the full player box score.
What the model made of it
Games it favoured correctly
2 of 7
Mean probability on the winner
42.4%
Brier over the series
0.3494
A backtest, and a sample of 7. The model was refit on games strictly earlier than each of these, so it never saw the result — but a record over a handful of games is not evidence in either direction. The one that means something is on the accuracy page, over 25,749.